Talk:Vibrating Bill/@comment-37841507-20190420083619/@comment-37841507-20190420194345

I understand the love and passion for the characters, I have that as well and I am not trying to come off as rude or cruel in any way or talk down to you, but this wiki is a page people go for legitimate and canon information and a lot of the stuff you said in your comment is borderline headcanon, even if it's gleaned from studying a photo or a line of dialogue, it's still an overanalystic view of what can be essentially referred to as throwaway NPC characters.

Is that saying they don't have personality? Not at all, but I'm simply staying that of course you're going to pick up these things from overanalyzing the photos or characters, I'm also trying to say in the nicest possible way that I don't think it belongs on the wiki articles. This is why I write fanfiction, to explore these characters and world without stepping on the toes of the NPCs that the DM has created or make assumptions based on my own projections and ideas.

Again, I'm not trying to be mean, I just need you to take a step back and think rationally about why this wiki exists and what people look for when they go here, information that's legitimately shown in canon and not anaylsis that the editors could have picked up along the way. Because nothing is canon unless it's specifically stated, I don't think that Corazon ever went into large details about his old crew and ther personality, that much can be assumed from Curly Joe because he was the main antagonist in the episode, but Bill is essentially a background NPC with very little dialogue or purpose.

I could add "Corazon loves cake" in his article, but that doesn't make it canon because nobody ever said that in the campaigns, and unless Andy specifically says something like that, I don't feel right having it on the wiki. I know this wiki is unofficial, but it's the only wiki, and the OX team is supportive of it, and I really want to make it a comprehensive place where canon information lies.

Again, you can still have an editors note section, I've never had a probem with that, but putting overanalysis or headcanons in the article is where I have to draw the line.